President Donald Trump is considering removing the security clearances for several Obama-era officials. So far six people are on the shortlist of Trump’s decision. The list starts with John Brennan, a former CIA Director. The other names are James Clapper, James Comey, and several others who might be considered ‘politicizing’ and/or ‘monetizing’ public service.
This is sure to fire up Democrats who support the following names, particularly those who go against President Trump and everything he fights for. Some Democrats just can’t be pleased.
“White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Monday said that President Trump is exploring whether to remove the security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan and other top Obama-era intelligence officials.
Sanders accused Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former FBI Director James Comey and others of “politicizing” and “monetizing” their public service.
They’ve politicized and in some cases monetized their public service and security clearances,” Sanders said during the daily press briefing. “Making baseless accusations of improper contact with Russia, or being influenced by Russia, against the president is extremely inappropriate and the fact that people with security clearances are making these baseless charges provides inappropriate legitimacy to accusations with zero evidence.”
Sanders’s comments came after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) suggested on Twitter that Brennan should have his security clearance revoked.
“Is John Brennan monetizing his security clearance? Is John Brennan making millions of dollars divulging secrets to the mainstream media with his attacks on @realDonaldTrump?” Paul wrote. He said he was meeting with Trump Monday to ask the president to remove Brennan’s security clearance.
Brennan and other former officials have been publicly critical of the president’s comments about Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Trump sparked bipartisan criticism last week when he cast doubt on the intelligence community’s assessment of Russian election interference — a remark he later walked back.
Last week, Brennan described Trump’s remarks alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin following their meeting in Helsinki as “nothing short of treasonous” and suggested they exceeded the threshold of impeachment “high crimes & misdemeanors.”
Sanders also said Monday that Trump is “looking to take away” security clearances belonging to former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe — the FBI official who was fired by Attorney General Jeff Sessions in March before the publication of an inspector general report that criticized his conduct.
Sanders declined to provide a timeline for when the security clearances might be revoked and also pushed back at the suggestion that the president is targeting individuals who had spoken out against him.
“No, I think you are creating your own story there,” Sanders said in response to a reporter’s question. “The president doesn’t like the fact that people are politicizing agencies and departments that are specifically meant to not be political.”
Sanders went on to refute the suggestion that Trump is himself politicizing matters of national security by going after his “political enemies.”
Trump has repeatedly derided special counsel Robert Mueller’s ongoing investigation into Russian interference which is looking into whether there was collusion between Trump’s campaign and Moscow. The president has repeatedly referred to the probe as a “witch hunt.”
“The president’s not making baseless accusations of contact with a foreign government,” Sanders said.
“When you have the highest level of security clearance, when you’re the person who holds the nation’s deepest, most sacred secrets at your hands, and you go out and you make false accusations against the president of the United States, he thinks that‘s something to be very concerned with and we’re exploring what those options are and what that looks like,” Sanders added.”
Note From the Editor: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of this website or of the owners/administrators of where this article is shared online. Claims made in this piece are based on the author’s own opinion and not stated as evidence or fact.